Environmental expertise

About the activity of expertise, it is perceived that it is seen by the academic graduates as something very complex and little practicable, when in reality it is not. Any person holding a higher education diploma may register in the regions of their region and receive the charge of the magistrates. What is happening in practice is that many are interested, but there is a great fear about the possibility of making mistakes and consequently being punished, discredited professionally or unfair to those involved in the judicial process. A fact that can only have an explanation - Lack of adequate technical / scientific knowledge. The market is full of lousy professionals, many with sloth-based training and so many cheaters como fazer uma perícia ambiental.

Another point that should be noted is the low number of experts registered in the counties in relation to the enormous number of degrees awarded each year by universities. This fact resembles the low number of professionals legally qualified to practice regulated activities in Brazil.

The final product of the skill is the making of an "Expert Report". This issue requires special attention from professionals in all areas of knowledge. It is of the utmost importance that the professional check with his or her class council for the regulation of his profession, where the function of "issuing reports" within his area of ​​competence must be expressly foreseen so that there is no committing the crime of exercise irregularity of the profession, discredit of the services rendered and probable vexatious questions when in court.

For those who wish to practice forensics as a profession or as a second source of income, it is essential to maintain a constant dedication to technical studies and updating of pertinent legislation. It is a market with high demand for qualified professionals and in the area of ​​environmental knowledge there are already professionals specializing in large areas of management, engineering and environmental law.

On the techniques of measuring and assessing environmental damage, Tessler (2004) stated that "all techniques are valid from the point of view of neoclassical microeconomics", that is, it argues that there is no value inherent to the goods, but that the value is found in the relation between the object and the person who will get the object, therefore, the value is subjective. In agreement with this positioning, the literature clarifies that it is not possible to calculate the monetary value of a given environmental good perfectly, due to the numerous correlations that exist. It occurs that, each technique alone, is insufficient to measure and evaluate environmental damages. Ideally, there should be a weighted pairing of techniques, adapting them to the concrete case, analyzing both objective and subjective aspects, using techniques of direct and indirect nature combined.

It is certain that the need for environmental valuation exists, the existing techniques are still flaws, the experts are few, the importance is wide and the opportunity for good and extensive work.